German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA)
 
 
 
 

Unbenanntes Dokument

Research Project of the Research Programme 1, supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG):

Persistence and Change of Neopatrimonialism in Various Non-OECD Regions


 

The concept of neopatrimonialism, a mix of rational-legal and patrimonial rule, is often used to describe the exercise of authority in non-OECD regions. Neopatrimonial systems are defined by the dominance of certain informal institutions over formal, state institutions. There are three main dimensions of neopatrimonial rule:

  1. power concentration in the hands of patrons,
  2. provision of personal favours through direct or indirect exchange between patrons and clients, and
  3. particularistic use of state resources.

Existing research demonstrates that neopatrimonialism is highly flexible and resilient. Yet, the reasons for persistence and change of neopatrimonialism remain unclear. Political economy concepts imply that high rents from enclave economies, e.g. originating from mining, oil extraction or from Official Development Assistance (ODA), are responsible for the persistence of neopatrimonialism. Lowering rents in contrast could cause the change of neopatrimonialism. The project endeavours to systematically investigate the explanatory power of this political economy concept. It compares – with an identical analytical grid – one enclave with a non-enclave economy in Africa, Latin America and Southeast Asia. In addition a set of five intervening variables is taken into account. The case studies are Zambia and Kenya, Venezuela and Argentina, Indonesia and the Philippines. The comparison will elicit systematic information about commonalities of and differences between the three regions and, in turn, will provide new insights about fundamental mechanisms, which are responsible for the persistence and change of neopatrimonialism. On a methodological level the main contribution of the project will be the operationalisation of neopatrimonialism.

Back to Research Team Overview

 

The project is guided by four main research questions:

  1. How can neopatrimonialism be adequately operationalised for systematic comparative research?
  2. Which factors explain persistence and change of neopatrimonialism? Which general evidence can be generated?
  3. Are there systematic differences and commonalities concerning the explanatory factors in the three regions Africa, Latin America and Southeast Asia?
  4. Are there systematic differences and commonalities between enclave and non-enclave economies?

 

Workshop: "Neopatrimonialism in Various World Regions"

On August 23, 2010 a workshop – concluding the first phase of the project – on the concept of neopatrimonialism and its application to various world regions was conducted at the GIGA. It focused on the discussion of approaches and methods currently applied, as well as the presentation and discussion of empirical findings in Latin America, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. (programme / papers)

 

Bibliography:

Selected Literature on the concept and manifestations of neopatrimonialim in various countries. (pdf)

Top

Previous publications (Selection):

  • Erdmann, Gero (2002a): Neo-Patrimonial Rule. Transition to Democracy has not succeeded. in: D+C Development and Cooperation 1, pp. 9-11.
  • Erdmann, Gero (2002b): Neopatrimoniale Herrschaft – oder: Warum es in Afrika so viele Hybridregime gibt. [Neopatrimonial Rule – or: Why there are so many hybrid regimes in Africa] in: Bendel, Petra/Croissant, Aurel/Rüb, Friedbert (Ed.): Zwischen Demokratie und Diktatur. Zur Konzeption und Empirie demokratischer Grauzonen. [Between Democracy and Dictatorship. On the concept and empiricism of democratic grey areas]. Opladen: Leske and Budrich, pp. 323-342.
  • Erdmann, Gero/Engel, Ulf (2007): Neopatrimonialism Reconsidered: Critical Review and Elaboration of an Elusive Concept, in: Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Studies, 45, 1, pp. 95-119 (Abstract).
  • Erdmann, Gero/Engel, Ulf (2006): Neopatrimonialism Revisited - Beyond a Catch-All Concept, GIGA Working Paper No. 16 (Abstract / Full article).
  • von Soest, Christian (2007): How Does Neopatrimonialism Affect the African State? The Case of Tax Collection in Zambia, in: Journal of Modern African Studies; 45, 4, pp. 621-645 (Abstract).
  • von Soest, Christian (2006): How Does Neopatrimonialism Affect the African State? The Case of Tax Collection in Zambia, GIGA Working Paper No. 32 (Abstract / Full article).
  • von Soest, Christian (2006): The African State and the Capability to Raise Revenue. A Comparative Study of the Tax Administration in Zambia and Botswana. Ph.D. thesis, University Leipzig

 

Applicants:

Dr. Christian von Soest, GIGA Institute of African Affairs (IAA)
Dr. Gero Erdmann, GIGA Institute of African Affairs (IAA)

 

Funding:

German Research Foundation (DFG)

 

Initial project duration:

01.06.2008 – 31.05.2010; cost-neutral extension until 31.05.2011

 

Principal researchers:

Dr. Christian von Soest (Project Coordination, Africa case studies: Zambia and Kenya)
Karsten Bechle, M.A. (Latin America case studies: Venezuela and Argentina)
Nina Korte, M.A. (Southeast Asia case studies: Indonesia and the Philippines)

 

Research phases:

06/2008 – 01/2009:   Desk research and preparation of field research
02/2009 – 06/2009:   Field research in the countries studied: Qualitative expert interviews with social scientists, civil society, donor representatives and civil servants of the local tax administration and education authorities. Focus group discussions in cooperation with local partners. Literature research
07/2009 – 05/2010:  

Data analysis, presentations and publications

23.08.2010:   Final conference

 

Presentations:

  • Bechle, Karsten (2010): Neopatrimonialism in Latin America: Prospects and Promises of a Neglected Concept. Paper presented at the GIGA Workshop: Neopatrimonialism in Various World Regions, Hamburg, Germany, August 23.
  • Bechle, Karsten (2009): Out of Africa. Applying Neopatrimonialism to Latin America. Paper presented at the 21st World Congress of the International Political Science Association (IPSA), Santiago, Chile, Juli 12. (Abstract)
  • Korte, Nina (2010): Rent Incomes from Natural Resource Extraction and its Impact on Governance Structures in Southeast Asia - The Case of Indonesia. Paper presented at the 6th Conference of the European Association for South East Asian Studies (EuroSEAS), University of Gothenburg, Sweden, August 26.
  • Korte, Nina (2010): The Nexus between Economic Rents and the Persistence and Change of Neopatrimonialism: Evidence from Indonesia. Paper presented at the GIGA Workshop: Neopatrimonialism in Various World Regions, Hamburg, Germany, August 23.
  • Korte, Nina (2009): Neopatrimonial politics and public administration reforms in Southeast Asia, Paper presented at the Young Scholars Workshop on Changing Governance in Asia, Center for Regulation and Governance, IIAS International Institute for Asian Studies, Leiden, The Netherlands, November 27.
  • Korte, Nina (2009):. Does Neopatrimonialism hinder Reform? – Tax Administration in the Philippines and Indonesia. Paper presented at the 5th General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR), Potsdam, Deutschland. September 12. (Abstract)
  • Korte, Nina (2009): Describing Governance Structures in the Philippines – The Concept of Neopatrimonialism. Paper presented at the 2009 International Conference of the Philippine Political Science Association (PPSA), General Santos City, Mindanao, Philippinen, April 4. (Abstract)
  • von Soest, Christian (2010): What Neopatrimonialism is – Six Questions to the Concept. Paper presented at the GIGA Workshop: Neopatrimonialism in Various World Regions, Hamburg, Germany, August 23.
  • von Soest, Christian (2010): Persistence and Change of Neopatrimonialism in Africa, Latin America, Southeast Asia. Paper presented at the GIGA Workshop: Neopatrimonialism in Various World Regions, Hamburg, Germany, August 23.
  • von Soest, Christian (2009): Comparing Neopatrimonialism: First Empirical Results from Africa, Latin America and Southeast Asia and Implications for the Concept. Tabled Paper presented at the 5th General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR), Potsdam, Germany, September 12. (Abstract / Full article)
  • von Soest, Christian (2009): Informal Institutions Compared – Persistence and Change of Neopatrimonialism in Various World Regions. Poster presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting & Exhibition of the American Political Science Association (APSA), Toronto, Canada, September 4. (Abstract / Poster)

Top

Publications:

  • Amadi, Henry (2009): Persistence and Change of Neo-Patrimonialism in Post-Independence Kenya. Research Paper for Project "Persistence and Change of Neopatrimonialism in Various Non-OECD-Regions, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies. Nairobi, July 2009. (Full article)
  • Korte, Nina (2010): Die Philippinen haben gewählt: Präsident Benigno „Noynoy“ Aquino III verspricht Wandel, GIGA Focus Asien, Nr. 7/2010, Hamburg: GIGA. (Volltext / Full article)
  • Korte, Nina (2009): Unerfüllbare Erwartungen? Indonesiens Präsident Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono startet in seine zweite Amtszeit, GIGA Focus Asien, Nr. 11/2009, Hamburg: GIGA. (Volltext / Full article)
  • Scherlis, Gerardo (2009): Neopatrimonialism in Argentina: Persistence and Change. Research Paper for Project "Persistence and Change of Neopatrimonialism in Various Non-OECD-Regions, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies. Buenos Aires, April 2009. (Full article)
  • von Soest, Christian (2009): Stagnation of a “Miracle”: Botswana’s Governance Record Revisited, GIGA Working Paper, No. 99. (Abstract / Full article)
  • von Soest, Christian (2009): The African State and Its Revenues. How Politics Influences Tax Collection in Zambia and Botswana. Baden-Baden: Nomos. (Abstract)

 

Other activities: